The MomShift Book: Coming January 2014

I am thrilled to announce that The MomShift: Finding the Opportunity in Maternity will be published with Random House.   The MomShift will be distributed across North America in January 2014 and then globally shortly after.

I’ll be working with a wonderful team of working mothers who instantly understood the goals of the book and project and thank you to my agent for making it happen!

I’m still actively looking for women looking to share their stories and perspectives as well as organisations interested in helping to build the platform for the project.

Interested?

Contact me directly: reva.seth@gmail.com

The Fatherhood Factor: A Tipping Point?

I’m deliberately late on my Father’s Day post.

The reason?

I thought I should wait until after the holiday to say that I’m happy that it increasingly seems as though Dad’s today are struggling to manage their work and family commitments.

The reality is that as long as work -life balance and alternative work options are considered “woman’s issues” no real cultural change will happen.   So the fact that fathers are now worried about parenthood, ambition  and managing careers as an involved father - can only be a good thing.

In one recent article examining whether being a good Dad ruins your career, Mike a father of three commented that, “Men are now in the position that women were in 10 years ago, torn between home and office.”

Boston College’s Center for Work and Family, recently released a report based on a poll of nearly 1,000 professional fathers from Fortune 500 companies called,  “The New Dad: Caring, Committed and Conflicted,” which concluded that, “Today’s dads associate being a good father just as much with the role of effective caregiver as the traditional role of ‘breadwinner’,” and that “These men want to be engaged parents and successful professionals, yet find conflicts as they try to achieve both objectives.”

And so, we have reached the milestone where, as a result of work life balance issues, working fathers are now almost as stressed as their wives. (Although I have to point out that, unlike mothers who face a financial penalty for having children, employers tend to view dads as being more committed and as a result, they tend to earn on average $6000 more than equally qualified men without children.)

So where to from here?  Well of course, two equally stressed parents isn’t an improvement.  It’s worse.

But my hope is that the rise in fathers feeling frustrated by narrow work arrangements and limited choices will become the tipping point for a genuine broader cultural change that allows both men and women to enjoy more work and family options and without facing a career penalty for doing so.

Career Wise: Is It Better To Be a Younger or Older Mom?

Forget the old adage about staying away from religion and politics, if you want to get an emotional conversation going raise the question of when is the best time to have kids?

Because despite the cliche that really, there is no “perfect” time to have a baby,  the crass question of  whether it’s “better” to be an older or younger mom is an emotional one regularly debated in blogs, papers and talk shows.

The  overarching trend is that women are having kids later, a shift that is impacting  fertility family dynamics and celebrity culture .

Leaving aside the health and financial issues for the moment, from the perspective of post-baby career success, is there any specific advantage to being an older or younger mother?

One common view is that being more senior and established professionally should make post baby success easier.  Certainly, the unspoken convention in professional services industries like law and management consulting used to be that if a women was serious about her career, she didn’t have a baby until she reached partner track.  This “pre-mommy” mentality extends beyond these professions to describe younger women deliberately working much harder than their male peers in an effort to establish themselves and “bank” career points – before they go on maternity leave.

When I was in law school, there were several “mature students” in my year.  Looking back, these women were probably in their early 40′s at the most.  And they had kids, who were around 10 and 11.  At the time, in my early 20′s, blissfully naive and convinced I had it all figured out, I thought this seemed backwards.  Since becoming a parent, I’ve always wondered about those women – my guess, is that after some initial hiring hurdles, they are all enjoying interesting and successful legal careers.

So if you want to have a close family and successful career – should you have the kids early or later when you’re more established?   Career advice blogger, Penelope Trunk,  puts it this way: you have your whole life to get a career, but that it not true for a baby.  However, a stable relationship, a means of financial support, all of these tend to be tough when you are young and having a baby without them, is of course possible, but probably not the best decision.

Sylvia Ann Hewitt‘s research suggests that regardless of when a woman becomes a mother,  just by becoming one, she’ll face a career setback and if she steps away or “ramps down”  then for the rest of her professional life she’ll face an enormous fine in terms of both cash and career arc, punishment for going outside of what she calls “the male career competitive model” which is built on a bedrock of unbroken service.   For her, change will come through demographics.  Specifically, falling birthrates combined with huge numbers of retiring baby-boomers will lead to what Hewlett calls “shortfalls in the talent pipeline”.

The MomShift interviews, are of course, focused on positive success stories and what I’ve found, is that:  post-baby success can happen just as easily with older as with younger Moms and that very few of my 135 post-baby success stories actually planned their babies around their careers or the other way around.

Women who waited until they were more senior and established, said that it gave them greater control over their schedule, a proven track-record and an established professional brand.  They also frequently referenced the belief that having kids later allowed to have a better sense of who they were and what post-baby success meant to them.

MomShifters who had their kids younger described the advantage of babies during their twentysomething wilderness years, “getting it out of the way” so to speak as they were finding what it is they wanted to really do professionally. For some this meant babies while they were in professional or graduate school or as they were testing out different careers. For others they took time to be home, then got back in to workforce and were still only in their late twenties. Several have spoke about the advantage of having children who were older and more independent as they were reaching the age and career stage that put them in the running for more senior roles.  For several interviewees, their children were what inspired them to achieve more professionally whether this meant increasing their finances, finding work with more meaning  or returning to school or training to be able to achieve more professionally.

The lesson that I’ve taken from these stories is that there is no right answer and that most women do have many more options than they realize.  Careers, like families are very personal and individual, and decisions on when or how, can’t be prescribed by career counselors, media commentators or colleagues.

Book Review: Womenomics

For the ladies out there, think about this the next time you’re getting into a car: designers have now changed the shape of the handle to accommodate your (presumably) longer finger nails.

This is just one of the clever anecdotes that veteran journalists Claire Shipman and Kathy Kay use to illustrate how changing demographics and increased spending power (should) translate into more options for individual women in the workforce.

Their book, Womenomics: Write Your Own Rules For Success promises to help women, “stop juggling and struggling and finally start living and working the way you really want.”

Too good to be true?

Well, yes and no.

Their essential argument is that changing demographics mean that women can demand   new rules of engagement from the corporate world, but that they need support and tips on negotiating it.

“Womenomics” refers to the power of women in the economy today (an impressive $2 trillion in 2001 in just the US) and the reality that women want to work differently.

The latter left me a bit skeptical. It’s hard not to agree with the idea of redefining success on your own terms, but even after  reading sections on “Confronting the Feminist Ideal’ and “Solving the Status Trap”, I was left with the question: are they just encouraging women to settle, and isn’t that what happens now? Plus, what about all the men that want to work differently?

The book is an enjoyable read, and has some fantastic research on the impact of social and economic trends on  the way in which we work.  My highlighter was working hard in the first few chapters and the book it at is best discussing the changing nature of careers and corporate life.

However, much of the advice in the later chapters is probably only applicable for very senior women, with a proven track record and who are very much in demand.  In one interview, the authors actually give a “Warning! To be sure you’re a valued employee, otherwise Womenomics is not for you!”

And this explains why many of their examples and interviews (Meg Whitman and Michelle Obama) don’t exactly resonate with the reality of many women.  They also optimistically argue that in a recession, employers want to accommodate employees, and so will “get smart” on how to do so.  Maybe for some.  But more women are probably  facing situations closer to the one described in the 2011 study by workplace solutions provider Regus: which found that the recession is awakening old prejudices about working mothers, making companies less interested in hiring them.

Still, the work world they describe in their closing call to arms (“customized, altered, flexed, feminized and yes balanced”) sounds irresistible to both women and men, so here’s hoping their  right.

So, what do you do?

Its holiday party time, which means (well for many of us) the dreaded question of, “So where do you work and what do you do?”

From perfecting your elevator speech to smoothly tackling this question, there’s no shortage of resources designed to help navigate the balance between interesting self promotion and earnest explanation.   But as anyone who’s ever struggled to answer this standard opener can tell you, what’s really unnerving is the way  this question neatly captures all your identity issues and career angst, in a mere five words.

For at least 3 years after I’d stopped doing anything remotely legal, I still identified myself as someone who, “started my career as a lawyer.”  Why?  I guess I felt comfortable with the label and what I thought (or hoped) it said about me.

In her recent post, “Maybe no moms are working moms” Penelope Trunk looks at how and why women tend to identify themselves, considering the role that your finances, what your peers are doing and what you used to do all factor in to how you respond to this question.  She raises some great points that I hope that MomShift will tackle but best of all, she suggests replacing that dreaded question with, “What are you focused on now?”  This provides freedom for those of us in between clear identities, or those who might work at something during the day but identify and focus on some other interest or project.

With career models, work options and habits rapidly changing, her conclusion that, “Maybe the truth is that the words we were using – stay at home mom, working mom – these were all patronizing words and what we should have used was more straightforward: adult.”  is going to (hopefully!) be increasingly true.

Where do you work?

For the first time in years, I’ll be working without an office or management that requires me to go to in on set days and at set times.  Ok, that’s not strictly true since I’ve always worked from home (mornings, evenings and weekends) and if I’m honest, have always felt that what I doing then was actually my real work.  And the rest of my day was a sort of a filler around that time.

Turns out, my feeling that I wasn’t really working at the office is not unique.

Jason Fried’s recent TED talk on, “Why work doesn’t happen at work?” describes how at the office we so often focus on “tasks” and not on achieving “results” (which would be real productivity).

The reason?

What he calls “the M&M’s” of managers and meetings, which provide us with involuntary and often unavoidable distractions.  And since work, especially creative work happens in phases, these interruptions that we can’t control, end up derailing our work day (explaining why when asked, people say they really get work done on the weekend, while traveling or otherwise out of the office).  For me, its the kitchen table and an empty house.

So I’m feeling optimistic about my new arrangement, but just keep myself on track, I just re-read Seth Godin’s blog “The Worlds Worst Boss” which would Me or if you’re reading, I guess  You…